We think we know who they mean when folks in Occupy movements across the world refer to ” One Percent”, don’t we?
Perhaps we conjure up images of Gordon Gecko out of the movie Wall Street or a health insurance CEO not paying out to terminally ill people living in poverty. But how accurate are our assumptions, those of us firmly in the “99%”?
In the UK, anyone earning an annual salary of £120,000 or above is, according to research by unbiased.co.uk, technically in the One Percent. Surprising, huh?
“Nonetheless, £120,000 is too much for anyone to earn!” you might scoff. Well, to someone on welfare, a job paying £18,000 may seem desirable; An employee or independent trader earning £18k could regard her neighbour on £50k as very well-off; And so on.
Where do we really draw the line when defining an obscene income? Sure, there are plenty of global-village-idiots proclaiming we should all work for a basic living wage, and who are so against private enterprise that one can only assume they hope for a communist dystopia in which we all work for our governments. (Indeed, a Green Party enthusiast in Scotland tellingly remarked of an article I had published elsewhere recently, “I hope no one got paid for writing that!”.) But where is our perspective?
By all means, let’s fight injustice, wanton profiteering and cynical exploitation. But let’s also keep a clear idea about what we’re saying, and who the real targets are in our campaigning for a better society.
(Thanks to ABillyRock for uploading this clip to YouTube)





In June, the European Commission may commence legislation requiring citizens across all member states to hold electronic ID cards.


